Risks of Pre-Term C-Section Should be Understood by the Patient

Cesarean section (c-section) deliveries are the most common surgical procedure performed on women, according to the March of Dimes. In fact, about 30% of the 1.4 million live births in the United States are delivered by c-section, often because it is medically necessary to protect the life of the mother or the child.

Doctors have often thought that pre-term delivery, delivery before 37 weeks of pregnancy, by C-section might give a fetus with a slower than average growth-rate the best chance at normal development. These babies were considered too fragile to endure the vaginal birth process without physical trauma or other complications. A C-section was viewed as a protective measure, in which it was believed that treatment for growth issues could be better dealt with after delivery through an Intensive Care Unit.

However, recent research conducted by the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) challenged the widely held belief that a C-section delivery poses no health risks for a pre-term baby who is small in gestational age. The study found that higher rates of respiratory distress were noted in these infants delivered pre-term by C-section. In fact, they were found to be 30% more likely to have breathing issues than pre-term infants born vaginally.

Unfortunately, there may be more repercussions to pre-term C-sections than just breathing issues. C-sections performed even at 39 weeks can be problematic for an infant‘s brain, which is still developing. Thus, pre-term babies delivered by C-section may also face lifelong physical and developmental problems, including motor control issues like cerebral palsy.

What may have been seen as a protective measure for pre-term infants with growth issues may now end up being an improper medical recommendation. The SMFM study suggests that the best outcome for a slow growth rate fetus might be continued gestation in the mother‘s womb, particularly if there is no imminent danger to the mother or child.

These are all matters that should be discussed with the expecting mother‘s doctor. This should be a thorough discussion of all the risks and benefits of a pre-term C-section. If a doctor is recommending a pre-term C-section, then the expecting mother at a minimum should ask for a second opinion.

The doctor‘s office can be an intimidating place. Patients are often reluctant to ask questions. Many do not want to second guess the doctor. However, asking a question and understanding the risks of a procedure is not second guessing. It is simply a part of good patient care. And honestly, with the risks of a newborn at risks, if the doctor is offended and sees it as second guessing, then the patient needs a new doctor.

A decision that could have life-long devastating consequences to the child and the family should not be entered lightly. Expecting mothers like all patients must take steps to protect themselves. After all doctors are not perfect. Most good doctors will appreciate the patient‘s involvement. Those that do not are those same doctors that at times remind the medical profession of its imperfections with avoidable medical malpractice lawsuits.


Share your thoughts